Health regulator accused of ‘gaslighting’ butchered patients
The statement said AHPRA had been actively engaged with many independent reviews and inquiries over the past 12 years and “all the reviews have been exhaustive and have recognised the integrity of our efforts and our genuine work to continuously improve our processes. None of these inquiries has found any fundamental flaw in the system of regulation – and instead have made helpful suggestions for continuous improvement.”
O’Neill’s comments follow a series of investigations by The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age and 60 Minutes into disturbing practices across the industry, including hygiene and safety problems and patients left deformed, and in some cases almost dying.
The sector allows doctors with basic medical degrees who have completed weekend courses to call themselves cosmetic surgeons, unlike plastic surgeons, who spend at least 12 years doing surgical and medical training.
Since the investigation began 10 months ago, hundreds of patients have come forward. Some complained of punctured lungs, nerve damage, constant chronic pain, psychological damage and feeling like they were in a slaughterhouse.
Fletcher, who has been in his role for 13 years, is due to front a media conference next Wednesday before the release of an inquiry into the cosmetic industry. The review was pitched as independent and wide-reaching, with a focus on social media.
The inquiry was triggered by this masthead’s investigation in October into the biggest network of cosmetic surgery clinics in the country, the Lanzer clinics, which revealed safety and hygiene issues including photos of human fat stored in kitchen fridges, syringes sitting alongside water bottles in a fridge, nurses being told to use expired medication on patients and audio recordings of Daniel Lanzer telling staff to send a patient to a GP.
“You page me first, OK? We can handle everything. Sending to a GP is the worst possible thing you can do, or to a hospital, never, ever, ever … and it always creates problems.”
Since then this masthead has done a series of joint exposes with 60 Minutes, uncovering more wrongdoing and highlighting more failings of the regulators.
The Herald, The Age and 60 Minutes obtained thousands of leaked WhatsApp messages between doctors and nurses at the Daniel Lanzer network of cosmetic clinics, as well as social media accounts, many of which were deleted, and found more damning behaviour.
One of the more shocking revelations came from scrutiny of Instagram accounts, which showed doctors performing surgeries in unregistered facilities, which was potentially illegal. This was under the nose of AHPRA, whose job it is to police social media.
Loading
Concerns are mounting that the terms of reference of next week’s review are too narrow and victims weren’t provided opportunities to appear in public and share their harrowing stories.
Even more concerning was the decision by AHPRA to appear in parliament in June, while the inquiry was under way, to support a proposal to lift a ban on doctors using patient testimonials in advertising.
This surprised the Australian Medical Association, whose president at the time, Dr Omar Khorshid, described it as “bizarre”.
“[The ban] protects patients, in particular vulnerable patients, from false and misleading advertising,” Khorshid said.
Consumer advocates Michael Fraser and Maddison Johnstone, who have developed software to police the sector, said if the laws were changed it would make the situation even worse.
“It’s already a billion-dollar industry and I think that’s largely due to social media. So, my big fear is that using testimonials to advertise cosmetic surgery, we are going to see a doubling of the issues here,” Johnstone said.
Every few years there are scandals in the cosmetic surgery industry but until now little has been done. There have been multiple inquiries going back decades that produce reports that go nowhere.
Loading
The latest revelations have led to growing calls for a royal commission. Professor Allan Fels, the former chairman of the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, believes the industry needs to be shut down for three to six months.
“This would achieve real change quickly and help overcome the lethargy shown by all involved – practitioners, regulators, politicians – in dealing with the continuing dangers to consumers arising from current widespread dangerous malpractices,” he wrote in an opinion piece published by this masthead.
The Morning Edition newsletter is our guide to the day’s most important and interesting stories, analysis and insights. Sign up here.
For all the latest Life Style News Click Here
For the latest news and updates, follow us on Google News.