The agencies won’t comment on their findings, and we might not learn the details for weeks. Banks and executives have typically 28 days to settle such probes or appeal to a Regulatory Decisions Committee, which reviews enforcement actions. If the committee backs the regulators, a notice on the findings would be published then.
Barclays and Staley could further appeal to a specialist tribunal.
While his departure is sudden, Barclays was well prepared. There has been chatter among investors in recent months that Staley might retire, and his replacement as CEO, C.S. Venkatakrishnan — referred to as Venkat in the bank’s announcement — was designated as the likely successor over a year ago, the bank said. Venkat had already been raising his public and media profile.
Barclays’s shares dropped on the news by about 2 per cent, not enough to suggest investors are uncomfortable with the change. The shares returned to their highest multiple of forecast book value in nearly three years on strong third-quarter results last month. But that valuation is below levels achieved earlier in Staley’s tenure.
Staley has seen off activist investor Edward Bramson, who demanded a breakup of Barclays, and he has bought more balance to the investment bank. It has won more equities trading business to match its traditional strength in fixed income.
Industry revenue has been inflated by a boom in dealmaking and trading that was fuelled by government and central bank reactions to the COVID-19 crisis. For Barclays, enduring success will rest on whether it can keep market share gains while not letting costs run too high.
The bank has also generated billions in spare capital that it will start paying back to shareholders next year, and Staley hired a string of competent and well-liked leaders — several from JPMorgan — to run the bank with Venkat.
But Staley has also been dogged by personal missteps from the start in London. He tried to uncover the identity of a whistleblower at Barclays who had made personal accusations about a close friend. That resulted in Staley and Barclays paying large fines to regulators. He also caused a rift for Barclays with private-equity firm KKR & Co. after getting involved in a dispute between the firm and his brother-in-law.
Staley would surely have wanted to stay long enough to announce a major buyback that would cap his time as CEO. At Barclays, he was a popular leader with an easy charm that contrasted with the colder, stiffer style of his predecessor Antony Jenkins.
It is the fallible, human side of Staley that will haunt his legacy.
The Business Briefing newsletter delivers major stories, exclusive coverage and expert opinion. Sign up to get it every weekday morning.
For all the latest Business News Click Here